RFR JDK-8003245 (original) (raw)

Chris Hegarty chris.hegarty at oracle.com
Thu May 30 16:09:48 UTC 2013


[cc'ing security-dev since this change is in their area]

John,

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jzavgren/8003245/webrev.01/

The changes in your above webrev look fine to me. I can sponsor this for you, unless someone from the security area wants to, or even additional reviews.

-Chris.

On 03/27/2013 04:30 PM, John Zavgren wrote:

Florian:

Yes, the uninitialized memory will be accessed in some cases, for example: @@ -1733,10 +1747,12 @@ CKX942DH1DERIVEPARAMS ckParam; jfieldID fieldID; jlong jKdf; jobject jOtherInfo, jPublicData; + memset(&ckParam, 0, sizeof(CKX942DH1DERIVEPARAMS));<--- added initialization_ _+_ _/* get kdf */_ _jX942Dh1DeriveParamsClass = (*env)->FindClass(env, CLASSX942DH1DERIVEPARAMS); if (jX942Dh1DeriveParamsClass == NULL) { return ckParam; } fieldID = (*env)->GetFieldID(env, jX942Dh1DeriveParamsClass, "kdf", "J"); if (fieldID == NULL) { return ckParam; } ----- Original Message ----- From: fweimer at redhat.com To: john.zavgren at oracle.com Cc: core-libs-dev at openjdk.java.net Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 11:48:57 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: Re: RFR JDK-8003245 On 03/20/2013 04:27 PM, John Zavgren wrote: Please consider the following changes that eliminate the use of uninitialized memory.

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jzavgren/8003245/webrev.01/ Is the uninitialized memory accessed on the error paths?



More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list