RFR 8014383: StringJoiner example in class description not in sync with streams API (original) (raw)
Iris Clark iris.clark at oracle.com
Fri May 31 16:52:43 UTC 2013
- Previous message: RFR 8014383: StringJoiner example in class description not in sync with streams API
- Next message: hg: jdk8/tl/jdk: 8014854: (bf) CharBuffer.chars too slow with default implementation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi, Alan.
That's what I remember too. There were just too many objections to completely removing all @author tags.
iris
-----Original Message----- From: Alan Bateman Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 5:57 AM To: Paul Sandoz Cc: core-libs-dev at openjdk.java.net Libs Subject: Re: RFR 8014383: StringJoiner example in class description not in sync with streams API
On 31/05/2013 12:26, Paul Sandoz wrote:
:
My understanding is the @author tag is no longer something we should be using for new JDK code (and to be egalitarian about it perhaps we should strip out @author tags from all the code!) I vaguely remember there was discussion on this topic a few years ago. I think (but might be wrong) that the guideline at the time was not to remove @author from existing code. In this case it is new code and if Jim is okay with it then I don't see any issue removing it.
-Alan.
- Previous message: RFR 8014383: StringJoiner example in class description not in sync with streams API
- Next message: hg: jdk8/tl/jdk: 8014854: (bf) CharBuffer.chars too slow with default implementation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]