jmx-dev [9] Review Request for 8038795: tidy warnings cleanup for javax.management (original) (raw)
alexander stepanov alexander.v.stepanov at oracle.com
Tue Apr 1 14:41:32 UTC 2014
- Previous message: jmx-dev [9] Review Request for 8038795: tidy warnings cleanup for javax.management
- Next message: jmx-dev [9] Review Request for 8038795: tidy warnings cleanup for javax.management
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hello,
Please see the updated webrev here: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~yan/8038795/webrev.01/
I just assume the removal of the
isn't really necessary. Yes, probably. That was done just to make tidy happy.
Thanks, Alexander
On 01.04.2014 17:44, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
Hi Alexander,
Looks good. I think I would remove the leading
in
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~yan/8038795/webrev.00/src/share/classes/javax/management/remote/JMXPrincipal.java.frames.html as well. If you don't please check that the generated javadoc for JMXPrincipal.java still looks good. While you're at it maybe you should remove the strange
between the @param tags in <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~yan/8038795/webrev.00/src/share/classes/javax/management/openmbean/CompositeType.java.frames.html>such as: 86 *
best regards, -- daniel On 4/1/14 2:57 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:I think you are looking for jmx-dev so forwarding to that list. On 01/04/2014 13:51, alexander stepanov wrote: Hello,
Could you please review the fix for the following bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8038795 Webrev corresponding: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~yan/8038795/webrev.00/ Just a minor cleanup of javadoc to avoid tidy warnings; no other code affected. Thanks. Regards, Alexander
- Previous message: jmx-dev [9] Review Request for 8038795: tidy warnings cleanup for javax.management
- Next message: jmx-dev [9] Review Request for 8038795: tidy warnings cleanup for javax.management
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]