Implicit 'this' return for void methods (original) (raw)

Andrew Haley aph at redhat.com
Wed Apr 2 09:08:02 UTC 2014


On 04/01/2014 10:20 PM, Eirik Lygre wrote:

> What is the relationship between this "naked dot" proposal and the "chaining of void methods" proposal? The reason for asking is not to be negative, but rather to find out if these issues are best dealt with together, or as independent proposals. I think that if either of these are going to happen, then they must be specified with the appropriate level of isolation: That which belongs together must be processed together; that which belongs apart must be processed apart.

Point taken, but Project Coin (small language changes) worked well.

Andrew.



More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list