8020860: cluster Hashtable/Vector field updates for better transactional memory behaviour (original) (raw)
Paul Sandoz paul.sandoz at oracle.com
Tue Apr 15 07:46:34 UTC 2014
- Previous message: 8020860: cluster Hashtable/Vector field updates for better transactional memory behaviour
- Next message: [9] Review request for 8039172: Tidy warnings cleanup for java.net, java.math, java.time, java.rmi
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Apr 15, 2014, at 12:54 AM, Mike Duigou <mike.duigou at oracle.com> wrote:
Should we proceed forward despite these understood limitations? My vote is a very soft "Yes".
I think we can proceed, things are not made any worse for the cases we care about, and i think we can slightly improve things as Martin suggests, plus we can update the documentation on enumerators and iterators.
Paul.
- Previous message: 8020860: cluster Hashtable/Vector field updates for better transactional memory behaviour
- Next message: [9] Review request for 8039172: Tidy warnings cleanup for java.net, java.math, java.time, java.rmi
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]