Long valueOf instead of new Long (original) (raw)

Pavel Rappo pavel.rappo at oracle.com
Tue Jul 1 14:39:11 UTC 2014

As per [1] I'm updating this thread with yet another webrev:

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prappo/8048267/webrev.05

[1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-July/027487.html

-Pavel

On 30 Jun 2014, at 13:04, Pavel Rappo <pavel.rappo at oracle.com> wrote:

If a test run finishes fine, I'll push this version (no Unsafe*LongFieldFieldAccessorImpl.java files included):

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prappo/8048267/webrev.04/ -Pavel On 30 Jun 2014, at 11:31, Andrej Golovnin <andrej.golovnin at gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Pavel,

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prappo/8048267/webrev.03/src/share/classes/sun/reflect/UnsafeLongFieldAccessorImpl.java.sdiff.html http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prappo/8048267/webrev.03/src/share/classes/sun/reflect/UnsafeQualifiedLongFieldAccessorImpl.java.sdiff.html http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prappo/8048267/webrev.03/src/share/classes/sun/reflect/UnsafeQualifiedStaticLongFieldAccessorImpl.java.sdiff.html http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prappo/8048267/webrev.03/src/share/classes/sun/reflect/UnsafeStaticLongFieldAccessorImpl.java.sdiff.html Please don't change the UnsafeXXXFieldAccessorImpl classes. This classes should be changed as a part of the fix of the issue 5043030. The patch for this issue has been already submitted, see here: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-June/027311.html When Joel is back, he will continue to work on it. Otherwise it looks good to me. Best regards, Andrej Golovnin

More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list