RFR 8049220: URL.factory data race (original) (raw)

Peter Levart peter.levart at gmail.com
Mon Jul 7 11:07:27 UTC 2014

Hi Pavel, Alan and Paul,

Thanks for reviewing. I accepted the suggestions from Pavel and Paul and created webrev.02:

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~plevart/jdk9-dev/URL.factory/webrev.02/

Is this good to go into jdk9-dev?

Regards, Peter

On 07/04/2014 04:54 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote:

On Jul 3, 2014, at 6:33 PM, Alan Bateman <Alan.Bateman at oracle.com> wrote:

On 03/07/2014 09:43, Peter Levart wrote:

Hi,

I noticed a data race in java.net.URL: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8049220 I propose the following simple patch: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~plevart/jdk9-dev/URL.factory/webrev.01/ A good catch and the change looks good to me. Yes, well spotted. May i suggest that the following comment is updated: 1109 factory = fac; // volatile write to say something about ensuring safe publication of a constructed handle? since it is often quite tricky to reason about why a volatile write is needed (to stamp in, at least, a StoreStore barrier). For JMM v9 we may not need to mark such a ref as volatile. I assume it just wasn't noticed because it can only be set once and probably rared used too. Yeah, i wonder whether it would ever get optimized/inlined to the point at which re-ordering could practically happen. Paul.

More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list