[concurrency-interest] ThreadLocalRandom.nextSecondarySeed() re-initializes TLR's seed (original) (raw)
Doug Lea dl at cs.oswego.edu
Thu Jun 19 12:02:06 UTC 2014
- Previous message: ThreadLocalRandom.nextSecondarySeed() re-initializes TLR's seed
- Next message: [concurrency-interest] ThreadLocalRandom.nextSecondarySeed() re-initializes TLR's seed
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 06/19/2014 04:48 AM, Peter Levart wrote:
Or, even better, why not just using the next value from the "seeder" sequence for the initial value of "secondary" seed and avoid interaction with TLR's main seed/probe:
Thanks! Or better, just use mix32:
+ if ((r = (int)mix64(seeder.getAndAdd(SEEDERINCREMENT))) == 0) => if ((r = mix32(seeder.getAndAdd(SEEDER_INCREMENT))) == 0)
I committed this to jsr166 cvs. As you noted, this only addresses an uncommon performance glitch. I don't have any further ideas since we discussed last year the tradeoffs between computing decent quality initial seeds versus class-loading. I still think we have the best practical compromise in place.
-Doug
} UNSAFE.putInt(t, SECONDARY, r);
Regards, Peter On 06/19/2014 10:37 AM, Peter Levart wrote: Hi,
I noticed an inconsistency in calling TLR.localInit() method. Everywhere it's called conditionaly if thread-local "probe" is zero except in TLR.nextSecondarySeed() where it's called if "secondary" seed is zero. This re-initializes the "probe" and "seed" even though they might have already been initialized. It's not a big deal, because this happens at most once per thread, but it would be more consistent to call localInit() conditionaly, I think:
diff -r 5b45a5efe417 src/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/ThreadLocalRandom.java --- a/src/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/ThreadLocalRandom.java Tue May 20 10:11:23 2014 +0400 +++ b/src/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/ThreadLocalRandom.java Thu Jun 19 10:34:18 2014 +0200 @@ -1034,7 +1034,8 @@ r ^= r << 5; } else { - localInit(); + if (UNSAFE.getInt(t, PROBE) == 0) + localInit(); if ((r = (int)UNSAFE.getLong(t, SEED)) == 0) r = 1; // avoid zero }
Regards, Peter
Concurrency-interest mailing list Concurrency-interest at cs.oswego.edu http://cs.oswego.edu/mailman/listinfo/concurrency-interest
- Previous message: ThreadLocalRandom.nextSecondarySeed() re-initializes TLR's seed
- Next message: [concurrency-interest] ThreadLocalRandom.nextSecondarySeed() re-initializes TLR's seed
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]