Long valueOf instead of new Long (original) (raw)

Otávio Gonçalves de Santana otaviojava at java.net
Thu Jun 26 10:15:17 UTC 2014

Thank you Chris. I don't know if is better, but I did with all wrapper in this path. http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-June/027285.html

But if will better, I can split each wrapper as path.

On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 6:58 AM, Chris Hegarty <chris.hegarty at oracle.com> wrote:

Otavio,

I skimmed over the patches and they look ok to me. I think they would be suitable for inclusion in jdk9/dev. -Chris. P.S. I do not currently have time to sponsor this, but I cc’ed Pavel who may be able to help get his in. On 14 Jun 2014, at 14:46, Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <otaviojava at java.net> wrote: > Reason: The Long class has cache and using it, will save memory and will > faster than using create new instance of Long. > > webrev: > https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/16109193/openjdk/longvalueof.zip > > similar: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044461 > -- > Otávio Gonçalves de Santana > > blog: http://otaviosantana.blogspot.com.br/ > twitter: http://twitter.com/otaviojava > site: http://www.otaviojava.com.br > (11) 98255-3513 > <suntools.diff><sunsecurity.diff><sunnio.diff><sunmanagement.diff><sunjvmstat.diff><javaxswing.diff><javax-management.diff><javatext.diff><javaawtimage.diff><internalorgobjectweb.diff><comsuntools.diff><comsunsecurity.diff><comsunjmxsnmp.diff><comsunjdnildap.diff><comsunimageio.diff>

-- Atenciosamente.

Otávio Gonçalves de Santana

blog: http://otaviosantana.blogspot.com.br/ twitter: http://twitter.com/otaviojava site: http://www.otaviojava.com.br (11) 98255-3513

More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list