Long valueOf instead of new Long (original) (raw)
Andrej Golovnin andrej.golovnin at gmail.com
Thu Jun 26 13:29:35 UTC 2014
- Previous message: Long valueOf instead of new Long
- Next message: Long valueOf instead of new Long
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Paul,
Seems fine to me (pending a full test run).
Just a syntax niggle in the following, too many brackets: +++ new/src/share/classes/javax/management/modelmbean/RequiredModelMBean.java 2014-06-14 10:16:02.486298421 -0300 @@ -544,7 +544,7 @@ } // convert seconds to milliseconds for time comparison - currencyPeriod = ((new Long(expTime)).longValue()) * 1000; + currencyPeriod = ((Long.valueOf(expTime)).longValue()) * 1000; if (currencyPeriod < 0) { /* if currencyTimeLimit is -1 then value is never cached */ returnCachedValue = false; @@ -580,7 +580,7 @@ if (tStamp == null) tStamp = "0"; - long lastTime = (new Long(tStamp)).longValue(); + long lastTime = (Long.valueOf(tStamp)).longValue();
Paul. Wouldn't it be better to use here Long.parseLong(String)? Long.valueOf(String) would always create a new object here, as expTime and tStamp represents the time and they are never in the range [-128;127].
Best regards, Andrej Golovnin
- Previous message: Long valueOf instead of new Long
- Next message: Long valueOf instead of new Long
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]