Review 8035808: Eliminate dependency to GetPropertyAction and other sun.security.action convenient classes (original) (raw)

Sergey Bylokhov Sergey.Bylokhov at oracle.com
Fri Mar 7 15:34:50 UTC 2014

Hi, Alan. Why we cannot move these classes to java.security.* package instead?

On 3/7/14 6:36 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:

On 07/03/2014 13:14, Florian Weimer wrote:

I think we had sun.security.action.GetPropertyAction for exactly this purpose. Consequently, the proposed change actually increases class size: -rw-rw-r--. 1 fweimer fweimer 6056 Mar 7 14:00 ./build-orig/linux-x8664-normal-server-release/jdk/classes/java/rmi/activation/ActivationGroup.class -rw-rw-r--. 1 fweimer fweimer 6656 Mar 7 14:06 ./build/linux-x8664-normal-server-release/jdk/classes/java/rmi/activation/ActivationGroup.class Fair, there is a second downside but usually there is a win if there are inner classes replaced. -Alan.

-- Best regards, Sergey.

More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list