RFR(S): 8034960: Serviceability tests using @library failing with java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError (original) (raw)
Yekaterina Kantserova yekaterina.kantserova at oracle.com
Tue Mar 25 14:31:09 UTC 2014
- Previous message: RFR(S): 8034960: Serviceability tests using @library failing with java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError
- Next message: RFR(S): 8034960: Serviceability tests using @library failing with java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 03/25/2014 02:53 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 25/03/2014 12:14, Staffan Larsen wrote:
I’ve looked at a random sample of these changes and they look ok.
Since some of the changes are in non-serviceability code I have also added core-libs to the review thread. I’m sure you know this, but for the record: please don’t push this until jtreg with the fix has been promoted. Thanks, /Staffan Katja - the changes look okay but I wonder about tests that didn't previously have @build or @compile tags. Take TestJcmdDefaults as an example, it now has: @build jdk.testlibrary.* and I just wonder if it should be: @build TestJcmdDefaults jdk.testlibrary.* so that it compiles the test in addition to the test library. This could be a misunderstanding on my part of course, maybe the source file with @test is always compiled if it's a java test?
My assumption is the test itself is always compiled. If it's false, I'm afraid we need to change a bunch of other tests.
Jon, could you please explain?
// Katja
-Alan
- Previous message: RFR(S): 8034960: Serviceability tests using @library failing with java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError
- Next message: RFR(S): 8034960: Serviceability tests using @library failing with java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]