RFR 9: 8077350 Process API Updates Implementation Review (original) (raw)

Alan Bateman Alan.Bateman at oracle.com
Wed May 13 14:55:31 UTC 2015

On 13/05/2015 15:16, Roger Riggs wrote:

Hi,

Are there any comments about the use of java.util.Optional in the ProcessHandle API? Or a review of the changes? Having parent return Optional looks good.

Having all methods in ProcessHandle.Info return Optional is probably right, it gives us a bit more flexibility compared to info() returning Optional.

I'm not sure abut the destory* methods, the result of a destroy is essentially a boolean so this feels a little odd.

-Alan.

More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list