[9] RFR (XS): 8169000: Define reference reachability more precisely in java.lang.ref package (original) (raw)

Mandy Chung mandy.chung at oracle.com
Tue Nov 15 01:51:11 UTC 2016


On Nov 14, 2016, at 6:28 AM, Zoltán Majó <zoltan.majo at oracle.com> wrote:

Here is the updated webrev with the updated text: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zmajo/8169000/webrev.01/

This spec uses “unreachable” to refer to when GC detects as unreachable. I think the current spec is correct.

What about this suggested clarification?

diff --git a/src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/ref/package-info.java b/src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/ref/package-info.java --- a/src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/ref/package-info.java +++ b/src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/ref/package-info.java @@ -77,8 +77,12 @@

Peter,

On Nov 14, 2016, at 1:59 PM, Peter Levart <peter.levart at gmail.com> wrote:

"It is the responsibility of the program using reference objects to ensure that the objects remain strongly reachable for as long as the program is interested in their referents." ...could be written more nicely like: "It is the responsibility of the program to ensure that reference objects remain strongly reachable for as long as it is interested in their referents." ...or even: "It is the responsibility of the program to ensure that reference objects remain strongly reachable for as long as it is interested in tracking the reachability of their referents."

Making it clear “strongly reachable” is a good suggestion. I don’t see word-smithing is needed in the original sentence; hence my above suggested change only adds the word “strongly” in this sentence.

Mandy



More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list