RFR: jsr166 jdk9 integration wave 12 (original) (raw)
Martin Buchholz martinrb at google.com
Fri Nov 18 16:46:34 UTC 2016
- Previous message: RFR: jsr166 jdk9 integration wave 12
- Next message: RFR: jsr166 jdk9 integration wave 12
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 11:17 PM, Remi Forax <forax at univ-mlv.fr> wrote:
----- Mail original ----- > De: "Martin Buchholz" <martinrb at google.com> > À: "Paul Sandoz" <Paul.Sandoz at oracle.com> > Cc: "core-libs-dev" <core-libs-dev at openjdk.java.net> > Envoyé: Vendredi 18 Novembre 2016 05:29:12 > Objet: Re: RFR: jsr166 jdk9 integration wave 12
[..]
>> 317 c.forEach(e -> addLast(e)); >> >> this::addLast, up to you which you prefer >> >> > Meh. Left as is; another vote could tip to the other side. > > I like the rule that says, use a method reference if you can and a lambda otherwise. so i vote for this::addLast :) Done! Seems like a good rule to adopt.
Rémi
- Previous message: RFR: jsr166 jdk9 integration wave 12
- Next message: RFR: jsr166 jdk9 integration wave 12
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]