RFR: 8170467: (reflect) Optimize SignatureParser's use of StringBuilders (original) (raw)
Claes Redestad claes.redestad at oracle.com
Tue Nov 29 14:03:26 UTC 2016
- Previous message: RFR: 8170467: (reflect) Optimize SignatureParser's use of StringBuilders
- Next message: RFR: 8170467: (reflect) Optimize SignatureParser's use of StringBuilders
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Andrej,
On 2016-11-29 14:39, Andrej Golovnin wrote:
Hi Claes,
76 public static final int CLASSNAMESBSIZE = 48; Why is this constant public?
Good catch, made it private.
Btw. for our product this value is too small. We have packages with longer names. I would use 64. :-)
There's no one size fits all: something around 48 is likely to help most common cases, while not noticeably penalizing shorter names. I'd consider it a bad move to regress apps with short-to-normal names to get a small gain on apps with very long names
Thanks!
/Claes
Best regards, Andrej Golovnin On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Claes Redestad <claes.redestad at oracle.com> wrote: Hi,
please review this patch provided by Max Kanat-Alexander[1] to improve performance of sun.reflect.generics.parser.SignatureParser by reducing number of StringBuilders created and the rate at which they are resized during typical usage. Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~redestad/8170467/webrev.01/ Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8170467 Thanks! /Claes [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2016-November/045046.html
- Previous message: RFR: 8170467: (reflect) Optimize SignatureParser's use of StringBuilders
- Next message: RFR: 8170467: (reflect) Optimize SignatureParser's use of StringBuilders
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]