8170539: Test clashes with another test with a similar name (original) (raw)

Alan Bateman Alan.Bateman at oracle.com
Wed Nov 30 16:58:58 UTC 2016


On 30/11/2016 16:53, Martin Buchholz wrote:

:

Also, in a case like this where a forest is broken with a fix available, shouldn't there be an emergency client -> dev integration? The jdk9/client -> jdk9/dev integration involve PIT so not doable in minutes.

In any case, I'm surprised that the issue didn't block the original jdk9/client -> jdk9/dev integration. Also when the issue was discovered then the fix should have been pushed to jdk9/dev and pulled down to jdk9/client.

-Alan



More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list