RFR 8080225 FileInput/OutputStream/FileChannel cleanup should be improved (original) (raw)
Peter Levart peter.levart at gmail.com
Mon Dec 4 13:47:35 UTC 2017
- Previous message: RFR 8080225 FileInput/OutputStream/FileChannel cleanup should be improved
- Next message: RFR 8080225 FileInput/OutputStream/FileChannel cleanup should be improved
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
This is a nice exercise in compatible migration from finalize() to Cleaner. The compatibility would be even better with a little tweak to the VM. Currently VM ignores empty finalize() method(s) and does not register the instance for finalization if it has empty finalize() (just return bytecode). There could be a special method-level runtime annotation, say @IgnoreFinalize that would be used to annotate no-empty finalize() methods and would have the same effect as empty method on the VM behavior. XXXStream could then just annotate the finalize() and leave it as is so that potential overriders of finalize() could call super.
Current approach (with AltFinalizer) is an approximation since it can only call finalize() and close() in succession. If overridden finalize() callse super.finalize() in the middle of the method, it may expect the stream to be already closed for the rest of the method:
@Override protected finalize() { ... ... pre-close logic ... super.finalize(); ... ... post-close logic (may expect stream to be already closed) ... }
...bust since super.close() is empty, the stream is not closed yet and will be closed by AltFinalizer after this.finalize() returns.
I don't know what impact does such order have on the compatibility. Probably not big.
Regards, Peter
On 12/04/2017 02:25 PM, Peter Levart wrote:
Hi Rogger,
On 12/04/2017 02:17 PM, Peter Levart wrote: Hi Rogger,
Interesting approach. Conditional finalization. You use finalization to support cases where user overrides finalize() and/or close() and Cleaner when he doesn't. I wonder if it is the right thing to use AltFinalizer when user overrides finalize() method. In that case the method is probably not empty and calls super.finalize() (if it is empty or doesn't call super, user probably doesn't want the finalization to close the stream) and so normal finalization applies. If you register AltFinalizer for such case, close() will be called twice. Ah, scrap that. I forgot that XXXStream.finalize() is now empty, so user overriding it and calling super does not in fact close the stream. You have to register AltFinalizer in that case. But now I wonder if the logic should still be 3-state and do the following: - if user overrides finalize() - use AltFinalizer to call both: first finalize() and then close(); else - if user overrides close() - use AltFinalizer to call close(); else - use Cleaner What do you think? Regards, Peter
- Previous message: RFR 8080225 FileInput/OutputStream/FileChannel cleanup should be improved
- Next message: RFR 8080225 FileInput/OutputStream/FileChannel cleanup should be improved
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]