Possible bug in StackFrameInfo#getByteCodeIndex? (original) (raw)
mandy chung mandy.chung at oracle.com
Mon Dec 11 21:53:17 UTC 2017
- Previous message: Possible bug in StackFrameInfo#getByteCodeIndex?
- Next message: Possible bug in StackFrameInfo#getByteCodeIndex?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I filed https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8193325. I can sponsor this patch for you.
--- a/src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/StackFrameInfo.java +++ b/src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/StackFrameInfo.java @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ if (isNativeMethod()) return -1;
- return bci; + return bci & 0xffff; }
Mandy
On 12/7/17 8:19 PM, David Lloyd wrote:
I was doing some research related to AccessController, and I noted this code [1] in StackFrameInfo#getByteCodeIndex():
@Override public int getByteCodeIndex() { // bci not available for native methods if (isNativeMethod()) return -1; return bci; } Now bci is of type short, and given the spec of the method, should the return not be: return bci & 0xffff; instead? Else it would return wrong values for methods with more than 32767 bytecodes in them. [1] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/file/e3b6cb90d7ce/src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/StackFrameInfo.java#l96
- Previous message: Possible bug in StackFrameInfo#getByteCodeIndex?
- Next message: Possible bug in StackFrameInfo#getByteCodeIndex?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]