Possible bug in StackFrameInfo#getByteCodeIndex? (original) (raw)
David Lloyd david.lloyd at redhat.com
Tue Dec 12 13:45:38 UTC 2017
- Previous message: Possible bug in StackFrameInfo#getByteCodeIndex?
- Next message: Possible bug in StackFrameInfo#getByteCodeIndex?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 9:03 PM, mandy chung <mandy.chung at oracle.com> wrote:
On 12/11/17 6:31 PM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
Java has an unsigned 16 bit type. Could bci be of type "char" ? Yes but I think keeping it short is fine.
Call me strange if you like, but I never liked using char as anything other than a UTF-16 character. Anyway one expects that the '0xffff' forms should be optimized fairly easily.
--
- DML
- Previous message: Possible bug in StackFrameInfo#getByteCodeIndex?
- Next message: Possible bug in StackFrameInfo#getByteCodeIndex?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]