[10] RFR: 8193507: [REDO] Startup regression due to JDK-8185582 (original) (raw)
Peter Levart peter.levart at gmail.com
Fri Dec 15 23:43:26 UTC 2017
- Previous message: [10] RFR: 8193507: [REDO] Startup regression due to JDK-8185582
- Next message: [10] RFR: 8193507: [REDO] Startup regression due to JDK-8185582
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Claes,
I see this is already pushed. I don't have any additional comments, but just want to know what was wrong with old code. You say that you used non-static inner classes. I don't see that in old code. All the lambdas you replaced with nested static classes should have already captured just local variables. I must be missing something and I would really like to know what.
Regards, Peter
Claes Redestad je 14. 12. 2017 ob 12:07 napisal:
Hi,
my previous fix failed due to use of non-static inner classes which kept the cleanable objects around. Also, Sherman suggested a more thorough fix to Inflater/Deflater after I had already pushed. Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~redestad/8193507/open.00/ Verified all java/util/zip tests pass this time. /Claes
- Previous message: [10] RFR: 8193507: [REDO] Startup regression due to JDK-8185582
- Next message: [10] RFR: 8193507: [REDO] Startup regression due to JDK-8185582
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]