8202794: Native Unix code should use readdir rather than readdir_r (original) (raw)

ted at tedneward.com ted at tedneward.com
Mon Aug 6 06:08:21 UTC 2018

Assuming I want to build JDK 8/9/10/11 (for research and spelunking purposes), what's the best way to do that if the changes aren't going to be backported? Turn off the warnings-as-errors (and what's the best way to do that), or somehow downgrade glibc (on my Ubuntu 18 image)? I could use advice/assistance on either approach.

Ted Neward Technologist and Leader T: @tedneward | M: (425) 647-4526 http://www.newardassociates.com

-----Original Message----- From: Alan Bateman <Alan.Bateman at oracle.com> Sent: Sunday, August 5, 2018 11:08 AM To: ted at tedneward.com; 'Pengfei Li' <Pengfei.Li at arm.com>; kim.barrett at oracle.com; bsrbnd at gmail.com Cc: build-dev at openjdk.java.net; 'nd' <nd at arm.com>; core-libs-dev at openjdk.java.net Subject: Re: 8202794: Native Unix code should use readdir rather than readdir_r

On 03/08/2018 20:26, ted at tedneward.com wrote:

Hey, all; did this get resolved? I'm still getting this error in pulled-yesterday clones of jdk8u and jdk9 and jdk10. I would prefer not to make local changes (mostly I want to build debug builds so I can spelunk the JVM bits), but if this isn't going to roll out fairly shortly I'll disable warnings-as-errors and carry on. The changes for JDK-8202353, JDK-8202794, and JDK-8207340 are in jdk/jdk for JDK 12. There are few residual issues/inconsistencies that came up and are still under discussion on the mailing lists. I don't think there has been any discussion yet about back porting.

-Alan

More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list