JDK 11 RFR of JDK-8202563: BigInteger/BigDecimal not immune to overflow, contrary to spec (original) (raw)
Brian Burkhalter brian.burkhalter at oracle.com
Tue May 8 16:20:45 UTC 2018
- Previous message: JDK 11 RFR of JDK-8202563: BigInteger/BigDecimal not immune to overflow, contrary to spec
- Next message: JDK 11 RFR of JDK-8202563: BigInteger/BigDecimal not immune to overflow, contrary to spec
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Joe,
On May 8, 2018, at 9:19 AM, joe darcy <joe.darcy at oracle.com> wrote:
On 5/7/2018 10:45 PM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
[…]
The unsigned * right shift operator ({@code >>>}) is omitted, as this operation only makes sense with a fixed word size. How about The unsigned right shift operator ({@code >>>}) is omitted since this operation only makes sense for a fixed sized word and not for a representation conceptually having an infinite number of leading virtual sign bit
This looks fine to me (as does the rest).
Brian
- Previous message: JDK 11 RFR of JDK-8202563: BigInteger/BigDecimal not immune to overflow, contrary to spec
- Next message: JDK 11 RFR of JDK-8202563: BigInteger/BigDecimal not immune to overflow, contrary to spec
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]