RFR for 6443578 and 6202130: UTF-8 in Manifests (original) (raw)

Philipp Kunz philipp.kunz at paratix.ch
Sun May 13 17:15:47 UTC 2018

Hi Brain and Roger,

Thank you very much for your hint about submitting patches.

In the meantime I got feeback [1] from Xueming Shen and I sent two (much) smaller portions [2] and [3] which makes [5] now obsolete.

I saw through my own messages again and found them having the patches attached. Both [2] and [3] have their patches attached in the email I sent as well as displayed when viewing the message in the mail archive as a link at the bottom. While not all my previous messages were in that form, I see that webrev form from me as not an author as in [4] is not useful and would guess this should be all right for [2] and [3] or else, please, let me know.

In short summary, I'd be glad to find a sponsor or get feedback for [2] and [3].

Regards, Philipp

[1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2018-May/052946.html [2] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2018-May/052962.html [3] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2018-May/052963.html [4] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2018-May/052942.html [5] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2018-May/052921.html

On 04.05.2018 22:24, Brian Burkhalter wrote:

For more specifics about allowed attachment types see [1].

Brian [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/code-tools-dev/2018-March/000378.html On May 4, 2018, at 12:51 PM, Roger Riggs <Roger.Riggs at Oracle.com_ _<mailto:Roger.Riggs at Oracle.com>> wrote:

Just a reminder that OpenJDK can only accept patches viacr.openjdk.java.net <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/> (as an author) or inline or attached in email.

More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list