8207404: MulticastSocket tests failing on Aix (original) (raw)

Lindenmaier, Goetz goetz.lindenmaier at sap.com
Fri Nov 30 12:56:39 UTC 2018

Hi Steve,

I'm not that familiar with the network coding. But if the VM thinks that IPv6 is enabled, but later on something fails, shouldn't the check for IPv6 be improved? Especially, if my and your box have been configured the same, this is probably the default on aix boxes. And I guess the VM should work on the default system configuration?

Or do you think that this should be fixed in the default system configuration?

Best regards, Goetz.

-----Original Message----- From: Steve Groeger <GROEGES at uk.ibm.com> Sent: Freitag, 30. November 2018 12:20 To: Lindenmaier, Goetz <goetz.lindenmaier at sap.com> Cc: ppc-aix-port-dev <ppc-aix-port-dev at openjdk.java.net>; core-libs- dev at openjdk.java.net Subject: RE: 8207404: MulticastSocket tests failing on Aix

Hi Goetz, I disabled IPv6 on my xLinux box and the MulticastSocket tests pass, as they detected that IPv6 is not enabled and then didnt try and set the IPv6 options. I am currently unable to disable IPv6 on my AIX box to test this but would assume it would also work as the code checks to see whether IPv6 is enabled and doesnt try and set the IPV6 options. It seems the issue with the tests failing seems to be, if IPv6 is enabled but the interface doesn't have an IPv6 address associated with it, as in your case here: bash-4.3$ ifconfig -a en0: flags=1e084863,480<UP,BROADCAST,NOTRAILERS,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTI_ _CAST,GROUPRT,64BIT,CHECKSUMOFFLOAD(ACTIVE),CHAIN> inet 10.xx.xxx.xxx netmask 0xfffffe00 broadcast 10.xx.xxx.xxx tcpsendspace 262144 tcprecvspace 262144 rfc1323 1 lo0: flags=e08084b,c0<UP,BROADCAST,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST_ _,GROUPRT,64BIT,LARGESEND,CHAIN> inet 127.x.x.x netmask 0xff000000 broadcast 127.xxx.xxx.xxx inet6 ::1%1/0 tcpsendspace 131072 tcprecvspace 131072 rfc1323 1 where you can see that the en0 interface has an inet address associated but doesnt have an inet6 address associated. I can see that IPv6 is enabled as the lo0 interface has an inet6 address (pointing to localhost) As I stated below, my AIX system was configured in a similar way to yours and the tests failed. When I was able to add an inet6 address to en0, everything works correctly. NOTE: Not sure this was correct but I ran 'sudo autoconf6' which seemed to add the inet6 address to my en0 interface. After that all tests worked. So I think the tests are working as expected, but the AIX system is not configured correctly, but I would like someone else to confirm this. Thanks Steve Groeger IBM Runtime Technologies Hursley, Winchester Tel: (44) 1962 816911 Mobex: 279990 Mobile: 07718 517 129 Fax (44) 1962 816800 Lotus Notes: Steve Groeger/UK/IBM Internet: groeges at uk.ibm.com Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU

From: "Lindenmaier, Goetz" <goetz.lindenmaier at sap.com> To: Steve Groeger <GROEGES at uk.ibm.com>, ppc-aix-port-dev <ppc-aix-_ _port-dev at openjdk.java.net> Date: 30/11/2018 10:18 Subject: RE: 8207404: MulticastSocket tests failing on Aix

i Steve, thanks for looking at this issue. > Should these tests work without having IPV6 configured on the interface? In general, tests should not show errors if a system does not meet the requirements for the test. In such cases the test should be skipped somehow. Maybe only a test fix is needed. Can you check on a non-aix machine without ipv6 whether the test passes? > Goetz, do you have IPV6 configured on the machine you were running these > tests on? This is our test machine: bash-4.3$ ifconfig -a en0: flags=1e084863,480<UP,BROADCAST,NOTRAILERS,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTI_ _CAST,GROUPRT,64BIT,CHECKSUMOFFLOAD(ACTIVE),CHAIN> inet 10.xx.xxx.xxx netmask 0xfffffe00 broadcast 10.xx.xxx.xxx tcpsendspace 262144 tcprecvspace 262144 rfc1323 1 lo0: flags=e08084b,c0<UP,BROADCAST,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST_ _,GROUPRT,64BIT,LARGESEND,CHAIN> inet 127.x.x.x netmask 0xff000000 broadcast 127.xxx.xxx.xxx inet6 ::1%1/0 tcpsendspace 131072 tcprecvspace 131072 rfc1323 1 I think this message should be posted to core-libs-dev, too. That's also the list where a potential fix needs to be reviewed. Best regards, Goetz. > -----Original Message----- > From: Steve Groeger <GROEGES at uk.ibm.com> > Sent: Donnerstag, 29. November 2018 17:07 > To: ppc-aix-port-dev <ppc-aix-port-dev at openjdk.java.net> > Cc: Lindenmaier, Goetz <goetz.lindenmaier at sap.com> > Subject: 8207404: MulticastSocket tests failing on Aix > > Hi All, > > I have been having a look at this issue: > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8207404 <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8207404> > <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8207404_ _<https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8207404> > > which was raised by Goetz Lindenmaier. > > When I ran the tests on my AIX system I got the same results as Goetz listed > in the issue. > > Looking at the failure I noticed that it was failing on a setsockopt call in the > native code in > the PlainDatagramSocketImpl.c file which returned a EADDRNOTAVAIL (Can't > assign requested address) > > Looking at my network configuration using "ifconfig -a", I noticed that my > interface "en0" which the test > was trying to use did not have an inet6 address configured (see below - some > addresses have been obfuscated with x's). > > en0: > flags=1e084863,14c0<UP,BROADCAST,NOTRAILERS,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTI_ _> CAST,GROUPRT,64BIT,CHECKSUMOFFLOAD(ACTIVE),LARGESEND,CHAIN> > inet 9.20.xx.xx netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 9.20.xx.xxx > tcpsendspace 262144 tcprecvspace 262144 rfc1323 1 > > configuring the IPV6 on my AIX box I then had a inet6 address configured for > en0 > > en0: > flags=1e084863,14c0<UP,BROADCAST,NOTRAILERS,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTI_ _> CAST,GROUPRT,64BIT,CHECKSUMOFFLOAD(ACTIVE),LARGESEND,CHAIN> > inet 9.20.xx.xx netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 9.20.xx.xxx > inet6 fe80::xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx/64 > tcpsendspace 262144 tcprecvspace 262144 rfc1323 1 > > with this configured the MulticastSocket tests all passed. > > Should these tests work without having IPV6 configured on the interface? > > Goetz, do you have IPV6 configured on the machine you were running these > tests on? > > Thanks > Steve Groeger > IBM Runtime Technologies > Hursley, UK > Tel: (44) 1962 816911 Mobex: 279990 Mobile: 07718 517 129 > Fax (44) 1962 816800 > Lotus Notes: Steve Groeger/UK/IBM > Internet: groeges at uk.ibm.com > > Unless stated otherwise above: > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number > 741598. > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 > 3AU

Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU

More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list