[JDK8] RFR (XS): JSR292: IncompatibleClassChangeError in LambdaForm for CharSequence.toString() method handle type converter (original) (raw)

Vladimir Ivanov vladimir.x.ivanov at oracle.com
Wed Jan 15 11:41:09 PST 2014


Chris,

Thanks for looking into this. See my answers inline.

Best regards, Vladimir Ivanov

On 1/15/14 9:51 PM, Christian Thalinger wrote:

[I’m resending something I sent earlier today to Vladimir directly.]

On Jan 15, 2014, at 7:31 AM, Vladimir Ivanov <vladimir.x.ivanov at oracle.com> wrote:

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vlivanov/8031502/webrev.00/ https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8031502

InvokeBytecodeGenerator can produce incorrect bytecode for a LambdaForm when invoking a method from Object declared in an interface. The problem is the following: (1) java.lang.CharSequence interface declares abstract method "String toString()"; (2) after 8014013 fix, VM resolves CharSequence::toString()/invokeInterface to CharSequence::toString()/invokeVirtual; Without having looked at the changes of 8014013, why did the invoke type change? Is it an optimization that was added?

After 8014013, LinkResolver::resolve_interface_call returns virtual (_call_kind = CallInfo::vtable_call), instead of interface method and MethodHandles::init_method_MemberName uses it as is (without any fine tuning, which was done before).

It's caused by the following:

That's how the conversion from invokeInterface to invokeVirtual occurs.

I did a quick debugging session with pre-8014013 hotspot to check how it worked before, but don't remember all the details now.

(3) during LambdaForm compilation, CharSequence is considered statically invocable (see InvokeBytecodeGenerator::isStaticallyInvocable) and invokevirtual for CharSequence::toString() is issued, which is wrong (invokevirtual throws ICCE if it references an interface); The fix is straightforward: during LambdaForm compilation, switch back from invokevirtual to invokeinterface instruction when invoking a method on an interface. I find this risky. Right now MemberName is only used in a couple places in java.lang.invoke but in the future it might be used for other things (e.g. java.lang.reflect). The information MemberName contains should be correct and usable without changing. Otherwise all users have to patch the information the same way as you do in your patch. I would like to see the VM passing correct information (whatever the definition of correct is here).

It's an interesting question what kind of correctness is required for MemberName and I don't know the answer. Looking through the code, I got an impression MemberName isn't designed to provide information to be used "as is" for bytecode generation, because, at least:

Best regards, Vladimir Ivanov



More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev mailing list