[9] RFR(S): 8075136: Unnecessary sign extension for byte array access (original) (raw)
Andrew Haley aph at redhat.com
Wed Mar 18 09:37:24 UTC 2015
- Previous message: [9] RFR(S): 8075136: Unnecessary sign extension for byte array access
- Next message: [9] RFR(S): 8075136: Unnecessary sign extension for byte array access
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 17/03/15 16:32, Andrew Dinn wrote:
Doh, apologies -- I'm afraid I am still one step behind!
The two new rules both specify an unscaled 32-bit integer register as index and, of course, the scale value is installed as 0 in the rule. So, the correct patch to function storeLoad is to include these two switch cases in the set which specify a sign-extend:
Hi Andrew,
I've been trying to follow this and I don't understand what you're asking Tobias to do. Can you please let us know what you think his patches should be like?
Thanks, Andrew.
- Previous message: [9] RFR(S): 8075136: Unnecessary sign extension for byte array access
- Next message: [9] RFR(S): 8075136: Unnecessary sign extension for byte array access
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev mailing list