RFR (S): JEP-142: Reduce Cache Contention on Specified Fields (original) (raw)
Kirk Pepperdine kirk at kodewerk.com
Mon Nov 26 02:01:41 PST 2012
- Previous message: RFR (S): JEP-142: Reduce Cache Contention on Specified Fields
- Next message: RFR (S): JEP-142: Reduce Cache Contention on Specified Fields
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I'm not arguing against the optimization, I clearly see the value. I'm just suggesting this is not a "Thinking in Java" solution, it's a "Thinking in C++" solution. Don't misunderstand, both are valid ways of thinking when done in the right context. ;-)
-- Kirk
On 2012-11-26, at 9:55 AM, Aleksey Shipilev <aleksey.shipilev at oracle.com> wrote:
On 11/26/2012 01:22 AM, Kirk Pepperdine wrote:
My mantra has always been, measure, don't guess. ...said the guy before start guessing about the impact for this annotation :D We know exactly where this helps, and where library developers sorely need this functionality, so here we are. In a few years, having this annotation around would help us to understand if that is applicable on broader scope, and what are the preconditions to be granted while applying this optimization. Having all that on the table, we could finally rationalize the budget needed to research and bringing on the automatic field layout. Before that, it's preposterous to invest several man-years into developing the optimization now known to be needed in a handful of cases. -Aleksey.
- Previous message: RFR (S): JEP-142: Reduce Cache Contention on Specified Fields
- Next message: RFR (S): JEP-142: Reduce Cache Contention on Specified Fields
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]