RFR (S): JEP-142: Reduce Cache Contention on Specified Fields (original) (raw)
Remi Forax forax at univ-mlv.fr
Tue Nov 27 01:07:33 PST 2012
- Previous message: RFR (S): JEP-142: Reduce Cache Contention on Specified Fields
- Next message: RFR (S): JEP-142: Reduce Cache Contention on Specified Fields
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 11/26/2012 07:40 PM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
On 11/26/2012 09:35 PM, Remi Forax wrote:
On 11/26/2012 05:44 PM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
On 11/26/2012 08:22 PM, Doug Lea wrote:
One small suggestion to slightly appease the nanny-state folks. How about burying the annotation one lever deeper to java.util.concurrent.atomic. +1 Still fail to see the rationale about this.
A lot of people already uses classes from j.u.c, j.u.c.atomic is more exotic. Given that @Contented is exotic too ...
Rémi
- Previous message: RFR (S): JEP-142: Reduce Cache Contention on Specified Fields
- Next message: RFR (S): JEP-142: Reduce Cache Contention on Specified Fields
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]