RFR (M): CR 8003985: Support @Contended Annotation (original) (raw)
Coleen Phillimore coleen.phillimore at oracle.com
Fri Nov 30 04:19:15 PST 2012
- Previous message: RFR (M): CR 8003985: Support @Contended Annotation - JEP 142
- Next message: RFR (M): CR 8003985: Support @Contended Annotation - JEP 142
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I sent a code review of this code also, did you see it? I am very concerned with the additional footprint that this allocates for contended flags for each field. Did I read this code correctly? I don't think this code can be pushed until this is resolved. Thanks, Coleen
On 11/30/2012 5:44 AM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
On 11/30/2012 07:35 AM, David Holmes wrote:
This work can not be pushed until the JEP has moved to the Funded state. So... How should one move it to the Funded state?
I'd also like to know what testing has been done so far from the regular hotspot testsuites. There may be places where layout assumptions are being made eg oops first. Are JPRT acceptance tests enough, or we should do the out-of-cycle VM testing before the integration? -Aleksey.
- Previous message: RFR (M): CR 8003985: Support @Contended Annotation - JEP 142
- Next message: RFR (M): CR 8003985: Support @Contended Annotation - JEP 142
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]