Request for review (S): JDK-8011009: Use do-while(0) instead of while(0) in EC_TRACE and RC_TRACE* macros (original) (raw)
Daniel D. Daugherty daniel.daugherty at oracle.com
Thu Mar 28 15:49:34 PDT 2013
- Previous message: Request for review (S): JDK-8011009: Use do-while(0) instead of while(0) in EC_TRACE and RC_TRACE* macros
- Next message: Request for review (S): JDK-8011009: Use do-while(0) instead of while(0) in EC_TRACE and RC_TRACE* macros
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 3/28/13 4:11 PM, Krystal Mo wrote:
Hi all,
Could I have a review for this small patch, please? Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kmo/8011009/webrev.00
src/share/vm/prims/jvmtiEventController.cpp Thanks for reformatting the macro while you were in there.
src/share/vm/prims/jvmtiRedefineClassesTrace.hpp I was wondering why you reordered the macros until I saw the updates to use RC_TRACE_ENABLED. Nicely done.
Dan
CR: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/viewbug.do?bugid=8011009
This patch improves the ECTRACE and RCTRACE* family of macros to be less error prone. They used to end with while(0) to make the macros statement-like, but a better way to do this is do {...} while(0). Testing with JPRT, will send an update email when it's done. P.S. I'm not sure where I should send this email for review, should it be hotspot-runtime or serviceability?
Serviceability would have been the default choice since this is JVM/TI code, but hotspot-dev is fine. You've already gotten a review from Serguei who in on Serviceability and now me (former Serviceability, now Runtime). Bases are covered, I think...
Dan
Thanks, Kris
- Previous message: Request for review (S): JDK-8011009: Use do-while(0) instead of while(0) in EC_TRACE and RC_TRACE* macros
- Next message: Request for review (S): JDK-8011009: Use do-while(0) instead of while(0) in EC_TRACE and RC_TRACE* macros
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]