RFR: 8035393: Use CLDClosure instead of CLDToOopClosure in frame::oops_interpreted_do (original) (raw)
Coleen Phillimore coleen.phillimore at oracle.com
Thu Feb 20 12:04:04 PST 2014
- Previous message: RFR: 8035393: Use CLDClosure instead of CLDToOopClosure in frame::oops_interpreted_do
- Next message: RFR: 8035393: Use CLDClosure instead of CLDToOopClosure in frame::oops_interpreted_do
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Looks good. CLDClosure is a shorter name too. Coleen
On 2/20/14 9:28 AM, Stefan Karlsson wrote:
On 2014-02-20 12:35, Mikael Gerdin wrote: Stefan,
On Thursday 20 February 2014 10.59.41 Stefan Karlsson wrote: Hi all,
Please, review this patch to change the closure type used in frame::oopsinterpreteddo from CLDToOopClosure to CLDClosure, which is an abstract base class of CLDToOopClosure. We need this for the G1 Class Unloading project, to be able to specialize the CLD scanning code during the Initial Mark phase. http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~stefank/8035393/webrev.00/ Looks good. Thanks for the review. StefanK /Mikael thanks, StefanK
- Previous message: RFR: 8035393: Use CLDClosure instead of CLDToOopClosure in frame::oops_interpreted_do
- Next message: RFR: 8035393: Use CLDClosure instead of CLDToOopClosure in frame::oops_interpreted_do
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]