RFR: 6983747: Clean up of unused dl_mutex lock. (original) (raw)
David Holmes david.holmes at oracle.com
Thu Apr 2 00:59:40 UTC 2015
- Previous message: RFR: 6983747: Clean up of unused dl_mutex lock.
- Next message: RFR: 6983747: Clean up of unused dl_mutex lock.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Looks good Max!
Thanks, David
On 2/04/2015 6:33 AM, Max Ockner wrote:
Hello,
I have removed the unwanted comment. New webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mockner/6983747.3/ (For now, please reply to me as well since I am trying to resolve some issues with the hotspot-dev mailing list) Thanks, Max
On 3/26/2015 4:21 PM, Coleen Phillimore wrote: Goetz or Volker, did you see this? thanks! Coleen On 3/25/15, 12:19 AM, David Holmes wrote: On 25/03/2015 3:13 AM, harold seigel wrote: Hi Max,
Should this comment be removed from both files? // Glibc-2.0 libdl is not MT safe. If you are building with any glibc, // chances are you might want to run the generated bits against glibc-2.0 // libdl.so, so always use locking for any version of glibc. Yes that should also be deleted - it was part of the incorrect copy done by 6721093. And as per 6626677 glibc was fixed at version 2.1 back in 1997. Since this was all investigated we had the AIX code added, so we need to get one of the AIX folk to confirm that no locking is needed around dlsym on that platform. (I would be very surprised if it were needed :) ) Thanks, David Thanks, Harold On 3/24/2015 1:01 PM, Max Ockner wrote: This was not intentional. I thought the comment was referring to the line containing dlmutex, but it was not. I put the comment back in. New webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mockner/6983747.2/ Thanks, Max
On 3/24/2015 12:35 PM, Dmitry Dmitriev wrote: Hi Max,
Can you please tell me, you intentionally delete following comment from oslinux.cpp file: 4680 // else it defaults to CLOCKREALTIME It seems that this comment should be leaved. What you think about that? I am not a reviewer. Thanks, Dmitry On 24.03.2015 17:56, Max Ockner wrote: Hello, please review my clean up of the unused dlmutex lock.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6983747 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mockner/6983747/ Summary: Deleted all references to the dlmutex lock which was no longer used. Tested with jtreg runtime tests.
Thanks, Max Ockner
- Previous message: RFR: 6983747: Clean up of unused dl_mutex lock.
- Next message: RFR: 6983747: Clean up of unused dl_mutex lock.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]