HotSpot workflow (original) (raw)
Vladimir Ivanov vladimir.x.ivanov at oracle.com
Tue Apr 14 12:45:56 UTC 2015
- Previous message: HotSpot workflow
- Next message: HotSpot workflow
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andrew,
mq [1] is part of my workflow.
Also, rebase [2] + strip [3] + histedit [4] combo looks like a good alternative.
I played with rebase and it enables interactive merge during rebase. AFAIK mq doesn't support that.
Best regards, Vladimir Ivanov
[1] http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/MqExtension My top commands: # Create new patch from uncommitted changes $ hg qnew
# Update applied patch on top and edit changeset message
$ hg qrefresh -e
$ hg qpush <name>
$ hg qpush [--move] [<name>]
# Fold 2 patches
$ hg qfold ...
# Commit the patch
$ hg qfinish
[2] http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/RebaseExtension [3] http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/StripExtension [4] http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/EditingHistory
On 4/14/15 3:26 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
I'm having some practical problems with the HotSpot workflow.
I usually have several patches on the fly at any time, but webrev and Mercurial don't really help. "hg push" and "hg merge" work on the whole repo, not just a changeset, so I've been manually saving changesets and re-merging them into the master tree, which is very error-prone and has led to some mistakes submitting changes. Also, the need to submit a change as a single changeset makes it awkward to commit regularly as I work on a patch; I can't find any way to merge a set of changes into a single changeset and push that. So, what do you do? Do you keep a source tree checked out for every webrev? Do you regularly commit as you work? Am I missing some tricks? Thanks, Andrew.
- Previous message: HotSpot workflow
- Next message: HotSpot workflow
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]