RFR (L): 8046148: JEP 158 Unified JVM Logging (original) (raw)
Marcus Larsson marcus.larsson at oracle.com
Wed Sep 23 11:02:15 UTC 2015
- Previous message: RFR (L): 8046148: JEP 158 Unified JVM Logging
- Next message: RFR (L): 8046148: JEP 158 Unified JVM Logging
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi,
I would prefer to keep the decorations as they are, but I can see the need for some way to distinguish similar decorations (uptime vs time, and tid vs pid). In any case, I've created a follow-up RFE 1 to resolve these issues separately. I don't think they should block us from integrating the framework, we can easily adjust this at a later stage.
Thanks, Marcus
On 2015-09-18 12:38, Kirk Pepperdine wrote:
On Sep 17, 2015, at 10:05 PM, Ioi Lam <ioi.lam at oracle.com> wrote:
Or, could we change the [] to <>? That way it's easier to parse by regexp. [2015-09-15T10:08:40.407-0100][0.203s] regex is: [([^[])][([^[])] <2015-09-15T10:08:40.407-0100><0.203s> regex is: <([^>])><([^>])> +1 It’s been traditional to use “[“ but moving to “<“ would make regex easier to read. Regards, Kirk
- Previous message: RFR (L): 8046148: JEP 158 Unified JVM Logging
- Next message: RFR (L): 8046148: JEP 158 Unified JVM Logging
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]