Optimizing byte reverse code for int value (original) (raw)
Andrew Haley aph at redhat.com
Thu May 11 09:02:14 UTC 2017
- Previous message: RFR(S) : 8180037 : move jdk.test.lib.InMemoryJavaCompiler to a separate package
- Next message: Optimizing byte reverse code for int value
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 11/05/17 07:46, Michihiro Horie wrote:
Thanks a lot for your helpful comments. I fixed my code. http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~horii/8178294/webrev.06/
@Andrew: Do you think this is the right way to do it and is there a chance to get it in jdk8u? Andrew, I would be grateful if you would approve this change for jdk8u.
The list of jdk8u reviewers is at http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk8u. You'll want someone who is on the HotSpot team.
I have mixed feelings about this patch. It seems too specific to me: if you had something that would work with any integer type it would be more useful, I feel. And - generally speaking - the rule is that patches go into JDK 9 first, but JDK 9 is closed for enhancements.
So, I'm sorry for the bad news. Your patch looks interesting and useful but I do not know how to get it committed.
Andrew.
- Previous message: RFR(S) : 8180037 : move jdk.test.lib.InMemoryJavaCompiler to a separate package
- Next message: Optimizing byte reverse code for int value
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]