Any new ideas on JDK-8187338 (Per anonymous class class loader data is costly)? (original) (raw)
Andrew Haley aph at redhat.com
Thu Nov 23 16:58:07 UTC 2017
- Previous message: Any new ideas on JDK-8187338 (Per anonymous class class loader data is costly)?
- Next message: Any new ideas on JDK-8187338 (Per anonymous class class loader data is costly)?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 23/11/17 16:50, Andrew Dinn wrote:
I have already reviewed this patch privately and found it to be ok. I'll leave Zhengyu to reply as to whether he thinks it is ready to push to jdk10 and/or down to jdk8.
Whatever happens, it needs to be made public in some form.
-- Andrew Haley Java Platform Lead Engineer Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com> EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671
- Previous message: Any new ideas on JDK-8187338 (Per anonymous class class loader data is costly)?
- Next message: Any new ideas on JDK-8187338 (Per anonymous class class loader data is costly)?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]