RFR (S): 8201326: Renaming ThreadLocalAllocationBuffer end to fast_path_end (original) (raw)
dean.long at oracle.com dean.long at oracle.com
Tue Apr 17 23:23:56 UTC 2018
- Previous message: RFR (S): 8201326: Renaming ThreadLocalAllocationBuffer end to fast_path_end
- Next message: (M) RFR: 8200167: Validate more special case invocations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 4/16/18 4:42 PM, JC Beyler wrote:
If I read your answer correctly: - You are saying that we should keep the end field altogether; or at least only rename the field not the methods to access it, thus reducing the change scope. - You are also saying to wait for the JEP-331 webrev's final iteration and integrate it in one step
Yes, my suggestion is to not rename access methods now, and try to avoid it in the future. I'm OK with renaming the field(s), but I don't have a strong opinion on what the new names should be.
dl
- Previous message: RFR (S): 8201326: Renaming ThreadLocalAllocationBuffer end to fast_path_end
- Next message: (M) RFR: 8200167: Validate more special case invocations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]