RFR (M) 8201505: Use WeakHandle for ProtectionDomainCacheTable and ResolvedMethodTable (original) (raw)
coleen.phillimore at oracle.com coleen.phillimore at oracle.com
Wed Apr 18 14:00:05 UTC 2018
- Previous message: RFR (M) 8201505: Use WeakHandle for ProtectionDomainCacheTable and ResolvedMethodTable
- Next message: RFR (M) 8201505: Use WeakHandle for ProtectionDomainCacheTable and ResolvedMethodTable
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
From some discussions, I've changed ResolvedMethodTable::adjust_method_entries() to have a for loop to avoid the bug in redefinition that this fixed. See:
open webrev at http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~coleenp/8201505.02/webrev
Coleen
On 4/13/18 8:12 AM, coleen.phillimore at oracle.com wrote:
8193524: Redefining a method that removes use of 1 or more lambda expressions causes the JVM to hang Summary: Remove oop pointers from runtime data structures and fix missing next assignment.
Also, this contains a fix for https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8193524 (forgotten next pointer assignment) because I changed that function 3 lines up, and tests contributed by Lois. Tested with mach5 tier1-5. Thanks, Coleen
- Previous message: RFR (M) 8201505: Use WeakHandle for ProtectionDomainCacheTable and ResolvedMethodTable
- Next message: RFR (M) 8201505: Use WeakHandle for ProtectionDomainCacheTable and ResolvedMethodTable
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]