Request for Review - 8152208: Summary for phase times are incorrect with and without UseDynamicNumberOfGCThreads (original) (raw)

Jon Masamitsu jon.masamitsu at oracle.com
Mon Mar 21 21:55:06 UTC 2016

Bengt,

Thanks for the review.

On 03/21/2016 02:13 AM, Bengt Rutisson wrote:

Hi Jon, On 2016-03-21 03:43, Jon Masamitsu wrote: The averages reported for phase times (for example "Ext Root Scanning") were incorrect. Not all the per thread values were included in the sum and the average value was incorrect (this with build 9-ea+1100)

[0.366s][debug][gc,phases ] GC(2) Ext Root Scanning (ms): Min: 0.3, Avg: 0.2, Max: 0.4, Diff: 0.0, Sum: 0.3 [0.366s][trace][gc,phases,task ] GC(2) 0.4 0.3 With the fix all values are included in the sum and the average is correct. [2.830s][debug][gc,phases ] GC(0) Ext Root Scanning (ms): Min: 5.7, Avg: 7.3, Max: 8.9, Diff: 3.1, Sum: 14.6 [2.830s][trace][gc,phases,task ] GC(0) 8.9 5.7 https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8152208 http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jmasa/8152208/webrev.00/ Nice catch! Your change looks good. The method WorkerDataArray::sum(uint activethreads) just above the average() method has the same issue. Can you fix that too?

Yes, indeed.

I messed up the delta a bit so all the changes are in the workerDataArray.inline.hpp webrev. The test has not changed.

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jmasa/8152208/webrev.01/

Jon

Thanks, Bengt

Thanks. Jon

-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/hotspot-gc-dev/attachments/20160321/14a0dbd7/attachment.htm>

More information about the hotspot-gc-dev mailing list