Request for Review - 8152208: Summary for phase times are incorrect with and without UseDynamicNumberOfGCThreads (original) (raw)
Tao Mao yiyeguhu at gmail.com
Tue Mar 22 03:06:51 UTC 2016
- Previous message (by thread): Request for Review - 8152208: Summary for phase times are incorrect with and without UseDynamicNumberOfGCThreads
- Next message (by thread): Request for Review - 8152208: Summary for phase times are incorrect with and without UseDynamicNumberOfGCThreads
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Looks good again. Thanks. -Tao
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Jon Masamitsu <jon.masamitsu at oracle.com> wrote:
Tao,
I've updated the 01 version. The test has not changed. Thanks again for catching that. Jon On 03/21/2016 03:16 PM, Tao Mao wrote: This change has a bug: double counting get(0); should start with s = 0 Thanks. Tao Mao On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Jon Masamitsu <jon.masamitsu at oracle.com> wrote:
Bengt,
Thanks for the review. On 03/21/2016 02:13 AM, Bengt Rutisson wrote:
Hi Jon, On 2016-03-21 03:43, Jon Masamitsu wrote: The averages reported for phase times (for example "Ext Root Scanning") were incorrect. Not all the per thread values were included in the sum and the average value was incorrect (this with build 9-ea+1100) [0.366s][debug][gc,phases ] GC(2) Ext Root Scanning (ms): Min: 0.3, Avg: 0.2, Max: 0.4, Diff: 0.0, Sum: 0.3 [0.366s][trace][gc,phases,task ] GC(2) 0.4 0.3 With the fix all values are included in the sum and the average is correct. [2.830s][debug][gc,phases ] GC(0) Ext Root Scanning (ms): Min: 5.7, Avg: 7.3, Max: 8.9, Diff: 3.1, Sum: 14.6 [2.830s][trace][gc,phases,task ] GC(0) 8.9 5.7 https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8152208 http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jmasa/8152208/webrev.00/ Nice catch! Your change looks good. The method WorkerDataArray::sum(uint activethreads) just above the average() method has the same issue. Can you fix that too? Yes, indeed. I messed up the delta a bit so all the changes are in the workerDataArray.inline.hpp webrev. The test has not changed. http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jmasa/8152208/webrev.01/ Jon Thanks, Bengt Thanks. Jon
-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/hotspot-gc-dev/attachments/20160321/875f22bb/attachment.htm>
- Previous message (by thread): Request for Review - 8152208: Summary for phase times are incorrect with and without UseDynamicNumberOfGCThreads
- Next message (by thread): Request for Review - 8152208: Summary for phase times are incorrect with and without UseDynamicNumberOfGCThreads
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]