RFR [S][2/7] 8197570: Make rules for choosing collection set candidates more explicit (original) (raw)
sangheon.kim sangheon.kim at oracle.com
Wed Mar 7 00:02:05 UTC 2018
- Previous message (by thread): RFR [S][2/7] 8197570: Make rules for choosing collection set candidates more explicit
- Next message (by thread): RFR [S][2/7] 8197570: Make rules for choosing collection set candidates more explicit
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Thomas,
On 03/05/2018 06:22 AM, Thomas Schatzl wrote:
Hi all,
can I have reviews for this change that makes the rule (occupancy) for choosing collection set candidates more explicit, i.e. factor it into a single method. This is needed for selecting the regions we want to rebuild the remembered sets concurrently (JDK-8180415) more straightforward. It also adds a method to allow iteration over the regions in the collection set - I did not see that worth an extra webrev. CR: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8197570 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~tschatzl/8197570/webrev/ Looks good.
One minor nit: You can add 'const' qualifier to the newly added method, CollectionSetChooser::should_add(HeapRegion* hr).
I don't need a new webrev for this.
Thanks, Sangheon
Testing: hs-tier 1-5, mostly in conjunction with related changes
Thanks, Thomas
- Previous message (by thread): RFR [S][2/7] 8197570: Make rules for choosing collection set candidates more explicit
- Next message (by thread): RFR [S][2/7] 8197570: Make rules for choosing collection set candidates more explicit
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]