RFR: 8214278: Cleanup process_completed_threshold and related state (original) (raw)
Stefan Johansson stefan.johansson at oracle.com
Wed Nov 28 09:20:35 UTC 2018
- Previous message (by thread): RFR: 8214278: Cleanup process_completed_threshold and related state
- Next message (by thread): RFR: 8214278: Cleanup process_completed_threshold and related state
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 2018-11-27 21:50, Kim Barrett wrote:
On Nov 27, 2018, at 4:32 AM, Stefan Johansson <stefan.johansson at oracle.com> wrote:
I totally agree that the style guide doesn't give any real guidance here. And as you say, we use every possible interpretation in the code base already except maybe CamelSnake. To me the most important is the last bullet, that it should be easy to understand that this is a constant. I also think the first point only talks about instance variables, so not statics. I don't see this as a blocker for this change, we have different preferences and I'm ok with this patch as is. I was going to write a longer reply, but decided this is the wrong forum for this discussion. Just a couple of points: Just to be clear, I don't prefer the style I used. I'm okay with CamelCase, and am agreeing to make that change despite it being (IMO) contrary to the style guide. And for the record, we do use something akin to CamelSnake, e.g. OpReg* :) New webrevs: full: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kbarrett/8214278/open.01/ incr: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kbarrett/8214278/open.01.inc/
Thanks Kim, this looks good!
Cheers, Stefan
- Previous message (by thread): RFR: 8214278: Cleanup process_completed_threshold and related state
- Next message (by thread): RFR: 8214278: Cleanup process_completed_threshold and related state
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]