Request for reviews (XS): 7011386: race in objArrayKlass::array_klass_impl (original) (raw)

Igor Veresov igor.veresov at oracle.com
Tue Jan 11 17:31:13 PST 2011


Looks good.

igor

On 1/11/11 3:48 PM, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:

You are right, I added storestore barriers and make these fields volatile:

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kvn/7011386/webrev Vladimir Tom Rodriguez wrote: On Jan 11, 2011, at 11:15 AM, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:

Tom,

Using oopstore() instead of oopstorewithoutcheck() will generate barriers but it is overkill. Those are gc barriers. I was really referring to fences. The code is a classic instance of the double check locking idiom for lazy init: objArrayKlassHandle ak (THREAD, thisoop->higherdimension()); if (ak.isnull()) { if (ornull) return NULL; ResourceMark rm; JavaThread *jt = (JavaThread *)THREAD; { MutexLocker mc(Compilelock, THREAD); // for vtables // Ensure atomic creation of higher dimensions MutexLocker mu(MultiArraylock, THREAD); // Check if another thread beat us ak = objArrayKlassHandle(THREAD, thisoop->higherdimension()); if( ak.isnull() ) { So doesn't that mean that we need a fence of some kind? tom I think marking receiver as volatile should be enough: void sethigherdimension(klassOop k) volatile { oopstorewithoutcheck((oop*) &higherdimension, (oop) k); } void setlowerdimension(klassOop k) volatile { oopstorewithoutcheck((oop*) &lowerdimension, (oop) k); } Thanks, Vladimir Tom Rodriguez wrote: That look good, though I keep wondering if we need a barrier in between or if those fields really should be volatile. It seems like we're playing a little loose with the locking for these lazy values. tom On Jan 11, 2011, at 9:54 AM, Vladimir Kozlov wrote: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kvn/7011386/webrev

Fixed 7011386: race in objArrayKlass::arrayklassimpl Other threads may access lowerdimension field before it is initialized by thread which holds the lock in objArrayKlass::arrayklassimpl(). Move lowerdimension field initialization before higherdimension.



More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev mailing list