RFR (S) round 0 for 8141068 Refactor -XXFlags= code in preparation for removal (original) (raw)
Ron Durbin ron.durbin at oracle.com
Fri Nov 6 20:54:48 UTC 2015
- Previous message: RFR (S) round 0 for 8141068 Refactor -XXFlags= code in preparation for removal
- Next message: RFR (S) round 0 for 8141068 Refactor -XXFlags= code in preparation for removal
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Thanks for all of your review on this issue.
-----Original Message----- From: Daniel D. Daugherty Sent: Friday, November 06, 2015 12:19 PM To: Ron Durbin; hotspot-runtime-dev at openjdk.java.net Subject: Re: RFR (S) round 0 for 8141068 Refactor -XXFlags= code in preparation for removal
On 11/6/15 12:05 PM, Ron Durbin wrote: This bug fix consists of a refactoring/cleanup of the -XX:Flags code.
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rdurbin/8141068OCR0JDK9webrev src/share/vm/runtime/arguments.hpp No comments. src/share/vm/runtime/arguments.cpp No comments. Thanks for detangling the '-XX:Flags=' options support from the rest of the more recent (and modern?) cmd options changes. That will make it easier to (hopefully) deprecate (and eventually remove) the '-XX:Flags=' option... If we decide not to remove the '-XX:Flags=' option, then at least we don't have to carry its baggage through all the new function calls... Dan
Bug report: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8141068 This bug fix has been tested on: OS: Solaris, MAC, Windows, Linux Tests: Manual unit tests JPRT with -testset hotspot(including the SQE current test coverage for this feature.)
- Previous message: RFR (S) round 0 for 8141068 Refactor -XXFlags= code in preparation for removal
- Next message: RFR (S) round 0 for 8141068 Refactor -XXFlags= code in preparation for removal
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]