RFR (S) round 0 for 8141068 Refactor -XXFlags= code in preparation for removal (original) (raw)
Coleen Phillimore coleen.phillimore at oracle.com
Tue Nov 10 21:16:36 UTC 2015
- Previous message: RFR (S) round 0 for 8141068 Refactor -XXFlags= code in preparation for removal
- Next message: RFR (S) round 0 for 8141068 Refactor -XXFlags= code in preparation for removal
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Okay, this is fine. Looking forward to future improvements. Coleen
On 11/10/15 4:02 PM, Ron Durbin wrote:
Coleen
This is to formally respond to your email. Dan and I agreed the change you are requesting should be done, but not in this change set. Keeping this change set to only XX:Flags changes. A future change set that could clean up the options file processing should address your issue. Ron
-----Original Message----- From: Coleen Phillimore Sent: Monday, November 09, 2015 2:03 PM To: hotspot-runtime-dev at openjdk.java.net Subject: Re: RFR (S) round 0 for 8141068 Refactor -XXFlags= code in preparation for removal
Ron, This looks really good! Although I don't see why you need to pass vmoptionsfile argument into matchspecialoptionsandact now since it's not used afterward, so you only have to pass one NULL in the cases where vmoptionsfile is not allowed. thanks, Coleen On 11/6/15 2:05 PM, Ron Durbin wrote: This bug fix consists of a refactoring/cleanup of the -XX:Flags code. Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rdurbin/8141068OCR0JDK9webrev
Bug report: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8141068 This bug fix has been tested on: OS: Solaris, MAC, Windows, Linux Tests: Manual unit tests JPRT with -testset hotspot(including the SQE current test coverage for this feature.)
- Previous message: RFR (S) round 0 for 8141068 Refactor -XXFlags= code in preparation for removal
- Next message: RFR (S) round 0 for 8141068 Refactor -XXFlags= code in preparation for removal
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]