Code Review for JEP 259: Stack-Walking API (original) (raw)
Mandy Chung mandy.chung at oracle.com
Thu Nov 12 16:58:06 UTC 2015
- Previous message: Code Review for JEP 259: Stack-Walking API
- Next message: Code Review for JEP 259: Stack-Walking API
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Nov 11, 2015, at 3:48 PM, John Rose <john.r.rose at oracle.com> wrote:
I added it to make backtraces for internally generated functions more informative. Since the stack walker will be able to surface BCIs directly, there will be no need for it.
I see.
We can add StackFrame::getBCI in the future. Since this is for diagnosability, StackFrame::toString can include bci for unknown source, something like this:
Test$$Lambda$1/1020391880.accept(Unknown Source bci:4) java.util.Spliterators$ArraySpliterator.forEachRemaining(Spliterators.java:948) java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$Head.forEach(ReferencePipeline.java:591)
Mandy
- Previous message: Code Review for JEP 259: Stack-Walking API
- Next message: Code Review for JEP 259: Stack-Walking API
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]