RFR: 8027429: Add diagnostic command VM.info to get hs_err print-out (original) (raw)

Coleen Phillimore coleen.phillimore at oracle.com
Thu Oct 29 11:26:38 UTC 2015

So I actually disagree. I don't think there should be an additional separate mechanism to get the same information that we get with hs_err reporting. I've wanted to have a feature like this for a long time.

I pre-reviewed this change and I thought it looked good in general. I didn't see the thread iteration problem that Fred refers to below, but I think the individual problems can be fixed.

The last thing I want is this code to be copied somewhere else.

Coleen

On 10/28/15 8:48 PM, David Holmes wrote:

I agree with Fred, this kind of info reporting should not be piggy-backed onto VMError handling for the reasons stated (and the error handling logic is complicated enough as it is!). For things like thread lists there are already safe management functions that can/should be used.

Thanks, David H. On 29/10/2015 3:29 AM, Frederic Parain wrote: Hi David,

I haven't review all the code yet, but I'm concerned with the fact that the diagnostic command is calling VMError::report(). This method has been implemented to be executed in the particular context of fatal errors, and its usage while the VM is running normally seems dangerous. For instance, VMError::report() consciously avoids grabbing locks because of the risk of deadlock during the error reporting. The consequence is that some data structures are browsed in an unsafe way. One example: VMError::report() calls Threads::printonerror() which iterates over the thread list without owning the Threadslock. The implementation of the diagnostic command seems also to exclude a lot of reporting from the initial VMError::report() method. Have you considered implementing a new MT-safe reporting method rather than trying to modify the special VMError::report() methods? (Note that some code factorization between VMError::report() and this new method should be possible). Thanks, Fred On 28/10/2015 17:18, david buck wrote: Hi!

Please review my change for this small enhancement. bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8027429 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dbuck/8027429jdk901/ Cheers, -Buck

More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev mailing list