RFR (S): 8211394: CHECK_ must be used in the rhs of an assignment statement within a block (original) (raw)
Thomas Stüfe thomas.stuefe at gmail.com
Mon Oct 8 06:48:25 UTC 2018
- Previous message: RFR (S): 8211394: CHECK_ must be used in the rhs of an assignment statement within a block
- Next message: RFR (S): 8211394: CHECK_ must be used in the rhs of an assignment statement within a block
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Looks good.
You missed:
classfile/verificationType.cpp line 113
return comp_this.is_component_assignable_from(comp_from, context,
from_field_is_protected, CHECK_false);
and possibly more, did not check further. Difficult to grep for when multi line.
Cheers, Thomas
On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 12:08 AM David Holmes <david.holmes at oracle.com> wrote:
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8211394 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dholmes/8211394/webrev/ If a CHECK macro is used on a function call that is part of a return statement i.e. return foo(CHECKNULL); then it expands into an unreachable if-statement that checks the exception state: return foo(); if (EXCEPTIONOCCURRED) return NULL; This is obviously a programming error, but unfortunately not something our often pedantic compilers complain about. There are two ways to fix: 1. Convert to assignment: T* t = foo(CHECKNULL); return t; 2. If the method is local and its exception behaviour easily discernible and matches the expected behaviour, then change CHECK to THREAD return foo(THREAD); Both fixes are applied as appropriate. As per the bug report I also revisited an earlier fix in this area - JDK-8062808 - and made adjustments. Thanks, David
- Previous message: RFR (S): 8211394: CHECK_ must be used in the rhs of an assignment statement within a block
- Next message: RFR (S): 8211394: CHECK_ must be used in the rhs of an assignment statement within a block
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]