Version-string schemes for the Java SE Platform and the JDK (original) (raw)
Mario Torre neugens.limasoftware at gmail.com
Wed Oct 25 20:28:46 UTC 2017
- Previous message: Version-string schemes for the Java SE Platform and the JDK
- Next message: Version-string schemes for the Java SE Platform and the JDK
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
2017-10-25 13:45 GMT+02:00 Stephen Colebourne <scolebourne at joda.org>:
For example, if Oracle and the community were to agree that LTS releases are the new "real" releases, then the most appropriate version scheme would be one that reflected that:
I resisted the urge to reply on other posts as per Mark's original request, but I think it's very important that we keep in mind that the short lived released in between the LTS are not beta, they are full high quality, stable and production ready releases.
While I also think that LTS will be the one most used in the industry, it's only because they live longer, they don't necessarily have a special merit over any other release.
Cheers, Mario
pgp key: http://subkeys.pgp.net/ PGP Key ID: 80F240CF Fingerprint: BA39 9666 94EC 8B73 27FA FC7C 4086 63E3 80F2 40CF
Java Champion - Blog: http://neugens.wordpress.com - Twitter: @neugens Proud GNU Classpath developer: http://www.classpath.org/ OpenJDK: http://openjdk.java.net/projects/caciocavallo/
Please, support open standards: http://endsoftpatents.org/
- Previous message: Version-string schemes for the Java SE Platform and the JDK
- Next message: Version-string schemes for the Java SE Platform and the JDK
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]